Thursday, January 7, 2016

Bringing out the best in humanity

HS 2016.1.5


One of my favorite Far Side cartoons shows a seagull television reporter broadcasting the death of a fellow seagull lying in the foreground. In the background are the flaming remains of a jet crash – the result of the ill-fated seagull having gotten caught in one of its engines.

The humor of course comes because it reminds us that turnabout is fair play:  human deaths are rather insignificant to seagulls.

This cartoon also illustrates an important principle about our circles of concern. Speaking personally, I am most concerned about myself. Merely losing a glove can ruin my morning.  Next come family, close relatives and good friends. I’m not overly bothered if one loses a glove, but if sick, I want to know. Then come casual friends, co-workers, and neighbors, followed by those in my immediate community.  Continuing from there, fellow Americans generate more concern than those in other countries.  Finally, having a European ancestry, I am more interested in what is happening in Europe than in other parts of the world. 

Let me be clear that I’m not suggesting that this is either right or wrong. I’m just claiming that this is the way I seem to think, and I suspect that others are similar. Each person stands in the center of ever-increasing concentric circles of concern. The more closely related others are to us – genetically, geographically, occupationally, and otherwise, the more concern we show. Tragedies overseas certainly do not have the news value of ones nearby. 

Indeed, if we were not built that way, we would not live long.  A newborn baby knows only of its own needs and lets everyone within earshot know of them.  Given this natural tendency, children must be intentionally taught to develop concern for others.

These circles of concern are found in non-human animals as well.  Social animals such as prairie dogs, lions and honey bees will help their relatives, often in direct proportion to how genetically related they are.  For example, a prairie dog that sees a hawk will warn the others by barking, even though doing so draws attention to itself.  Similarly, it may be that our tendency to care for those closely related to us is genetically hardwired in us.

But humans also have a moral consciousness that other animals do not seem to have. This enables us to rise above our mere animal nature and broaden our circle of care to include more people.  Essentially, how do we answer, “Who is my neighbor?”  As I write this, ABC News is broadcasting the story of a young black man who is donating his kidney to a middle-aged white man he does not know in another part of the country.  Why?  What compels some of us to make such sacrifices?


Religion may be one factor.  Religion is certainly a mixed bag because it tends to group and partition people and that plays into our predisposition to focus only on those close to us.  However, in a recent conversation with a Chinese student, I asked what differences she found between her country and the U.S.  She said that people were pretty similar overall, but she was surprised by some she had met in West Michigan who voluntarily gave up their good lives here to live in tough conditions around the world ministering to others.  Such people often come from churches.

 Good leaders and role models can also serve to bring out the best in us.  One important role of our political leaders is to challenge us to be better people.  FDR reminded us that we had nothing to fear but fear itself. Kennedy challenged us to “Ask not what your country can do for you. Ask what you can do for your country.”  More recently GHW Bush spoke of a“Thousand Points of Light.”  His son spoke of “compassionate conservatism” while our current president encouraged us not to be divided as blue states and red states, but to work together.

Likely, the success of these leaders in bringing out our best fell far short of their aspirations.  But their intention to help us look beyond ourselves was a reflection of their own good character. They were all following the example and advice of Abraham Lincoln who implored a divided county to live by the “better angels of our nature”.

Friends, having an expansive view of “neighbor” does not come naturally or easily.  Therefore, looking to the future, I hope for leaders who will encourage us to live by the better angels of our nature.









4 comments:

  1. Tim,

    I would like to take the opportunity to disagree with a few of your arguments in this month’s column.

    1. “A newborn baby knows only of its own needs and lets everyone within earshot know of them. Given this natural tendency, children must be intentionally taught to develop concern for others.”

    In my experience, we did not need to teach our daughter to develop concern for others. It’s a natural human instinct, as a social mammal, to care for others. I’d be interested if other parents who read this would agree with me.

    2. “But humans also have a moral consciousness that other animals do not seem to have.”

    I direct you to this article: http://www.npr.org/sections/13.7/2014/02/27/283348422/that-s-unfair-you-say-this-monkey-can-relate The point of the study is that monkeys (as one example, but there are more) instinctively have a sense of fairness, and will revolt against the injustice even if they are the one getting the benefit of the uneven treatment.

    3. The paragraph that starts with “Religion may be one factor.” The key word in this paragraph is “ministering”. The people who go to minister ALL come from churches, and the ministering is their real goal. The others who go to live in tough conditions WITHOUT ministering actually are there to help the others, without expecting any reward (human or supernatural), and without trying to convert those they are “helping”. If I simply give you a sandwich, no strings attached, is that not better than if I offer you a sandwich at the end of my one hour sermon/sales-pitch about my (imaginary) friend? Which of the two groups described are actually being the better neighbor?

    dave

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The better neighbor is the one who cares for the whole person; body, mind and spirit. What would be the point of giving a sales pitch for an 'imaginary' friend? It wouldn't be worth wasting ones time - let alone devoting your life - to such an endeavor.

      You have every right to believe that the God I serve is imaginary. But if I believe He is real and that this life is just a blip on the screen with an eternal destination beyond - and if I believe that stepping into eternity without Christ ushers one into an abyss of everlasting torment, is it not reasonable that I would choose to share that with others? Whether my friend is imaginary or not is another topic entirely. But as for who is the better neighbor, it is the one who is concerned for the whole person - not just in this life but in life beyond.

      Delete
    2. Beth, I agree with you so long as your offer of the sandwich gives me the option of simply leaving with the sandwich, without listening to your presentation.

      Delete
    3. Dave, I worked as a volunteer for the Boy Scouts for 35 years - some of those fine young men knew kindness, awareness and sensitivity to nature and to people. Others - had not a clue. Depends a lot on nurture in the family - whether or not kindness was shown and spoken of, and whether the family lived their words every day.....toward their children, toward each other, toward those beyond. It does not simply happen to all. We are all human - but we are not raised with the same values.

      Delete